David Tiltman
Feb 1, 2010

AirAsia & Jetstar: The deal that could make or break them

The battle for passengers in Asia's burgeoning budget airline industry took a surprising new turn this month when AirAsia and Jetstar decided to get into bed with each other.

AirAsia & Jetstar: The deal that could make or break them
Malaysia-based AirAsia, headed by the colourful Tony Fernandes, and Melbourne-based Jetstar, owned by Qantas, announced a deal to pool certain operations in an effort to reduce costs.

The deal involves no equity, meaning the two companies will remain officially independent but from a branding perspective, the issue becomes how close they can get without confusing consumers.

On the surface, as long as the marketing of the two brands remains separate, pooling operations to save money makes sense.

Tim Riches, chief growth officer for Asia-Pacific at FutureBrand, argues that the savings resulting from the deal may allow the two brands to go even further; it may enable investment in the customer's in-flight experience with lots of potential to create brand loyalty.

One benefit of the deal is that, although the two companies overlap on some routes, they are pushing in different directions - AirAsia into Asean and now Europe; Jetstar across Oceania and North Asia. Riches adds that the tie-up creates an operation with significant scale and reach that is not a national carrier.

In the long term, that may create new challenges. “When you end up with major airline brands disconnected from national identities, those brands have to look elsewhere for depth and authenticity to their brand image.”

That may not be the only challenge. Roll argues that, in practice, this semi-merger could be difficult. Regardless of the external face shown to consumers, a brand’s internal culture can be compromised.

Then there’s the next step - further collaboration, including perhaps some marketing operations. While the two firms have stressed this will not happen under the current agreement, they have not ruled out extending the terms of the deal in the future. If their priority is costs, pooling media buying, for example, could give the two firms greater efficiencies.

In fact, some in the industry believe the deal may be a first step toward a merger. Joseph Baladi, CEO of BrandAsian, says: “The obvious is sometimes the most likely - that the two airlines are indeed planning a merger of some sort, but are simply not saying.”

If that’s the case, the branding implications could soon become a lot more serious.




This article was originally published in the 28 January 2010 issue of Media.

Related Articles

Just Published

1 hour ago

Can retail media compensate for weaknesses in ...

Following reports on declines in performance media earnings, Campaign explores what strategies marketers can employ to navigate this changing landscape—including the promise of retail media.

2 hours ago

Guardian Malaysia wants you to 'own your beautiful' ...

The health and beauty retailer's latest initiative, developed with FCB Shout, challenges traditional notions of beauty.

3 hours ago

Woolley Marketing: An agency village can be the ...

Every marketing ecosystem has its weak link. Darren Woolley explains how to spot—and avoid becoming—the "village idiot" before your agency network collapses under its own weight.

3 hours ago

40 Under 40 2024: Meryl Adiel Hernandez, McDonald’s

Through her dedication to ethical practices and community well-being, Hernandez exemplifies leadership with purpose, leaving an enduring impact on both McDonald's Philippines and the communities it serves.