Jessica Goodfellow
Jul 1, 2020

Rubicon Project and Telaria re-emerge as Magnite

Company says maintaining its independence means it can offer publishers "unconflicted guidance"—unlike adtech firms that now sit within media conglomerates.

Rubicon Project and Telaria re-emerge as Magnite

Freshly-merged sell-side platforms Rubicon Project and Telaria have relaunched as Magnite.

The two adtech vendors announced their ambition to consolidate in December, to form what they claim is the largest independent sell-side advertising platform. The merger completed in April.

Now they are relaunching as a combined entity, called Magnite. The company will trade under a new "MGNI" ticker symbol on the Nasdaq Global Select Market at the open of the market on July 1, 2020.

The combined company unifies Rubicon Project’s expertise as a programmatic exchange and Telaria’s CTV capabilities. New York-based Telaria was formed in 2017 as a rebrand of Tremor Video, after the latter sold its demand-side business in 2015. The SSP is a connected TV specialist, powering Hulu's private marketplace. Los Angeles-based Rubicon Project was founded in 2007 and operates one of the world's largest ad exchanges. 

Magnite will offer a single platform for transacting CTV, desktop display, video, audio, and mobile inventory across all geographies and auction types.

The combined company has more than 600 employees across 15 countries.

Rubicon Project president and CEO Michael Barrett has become chief executive and president of Magnite. Former Telaria CEO Mark Zagorski, who became president and chief operating officer of the merged company, left in June.

Barrett said: “Uniting our rich technology, experience and partnerships under the Magnite brand brings us closer to being an essential partner for publishers and buyers. Now, more than ever, our industry needs an independent alternative to the walled gardens. At Magnite, we believe that collaboration is the path to a thriving ecosystem that works for everyone.”

The company emphasized its independence in the release announcing its rebranding, saying that since it "doesn’t own any media interests, it can provide unconflicted guidance to publishers paired with exceptional client service". This is a reference to various adtech acquisitions by media companies over the last few years, including AT&T and AppNexus, Singtel and Amobee, Roku and Dataxu. Servicing media clients while being owned by a media company can be seen as a conflict of interest.

The company also believes it will be "powerful, strategic alternative to the walled gardens", commented Zagorski upon announcing the merger in December, "which have been frustrating both buyers and sellers due to their lack of transparency, innovation bottlenecks, and conflicted business models".

Source:
Campaign Asia

Related Articles

Just Published

5 hours ago

Google’s US antitrust trial comes to an end as both ...

Decision on if Google would be held accountable and face consequences might not come before Q1 2025, according to Judge Leonie Brinkema.

5 hours ago

Agency holdcos face a new crossroads: Reunite media ...

Iain Jacob predicted five years ago that buying tech and data, rather than renting it, would help agency “dinosaurs” modernise. Now, he says, merging media and creative will be a key differentiator in the AI era.

23 hours ago

40 Under 40 2024: Lana Zhang, Merkle

Zhang's visionary leadership, dedication to innovation, and contributions to marketing automation have established her as a cornerstone of the industry in China and beyond.

1 day ago

What Chrome’s potential spin-off means for browsers ...

As the Department of Justice pushes for Google to divest Chrome, the ripple effects could redefine browser competition, shake up web standards, and disrupt the advertising ecosystem as we know it.