Anant Rangaswami
Aug 2, 2010

Increasing the scope of competitors can increase profits

More than two decades ago, I first heard the phrase ‘share of throat' in the context of Coca-Cola India's plans to introduce drinks other than carbonated beverages, thereby including all non-alcoholic drinks as competition.

Increasing the scope of competitors can increase profits

More than two decades ago, I first heard the phrase ‘share of throat' in the context of Coca-Cola India's plans to introduce drinks other than carbonated beverages.

Coca-Cola no longer defined the competition as others in the carbonated drinks business; they saw any non-alcoholic liquid consumed as competition. So water was competition, milk was competition, coffee and tea were competition, and so on.

Coca-Cola (and Pepsi) have, assiduously, been competing in the bottled water market, the juice market, the coffee and tea market, increasing their ‘share of throat'.

The increase in share increases their long-term viability, increases their turnover and their profits. In hindsight, redefining the competition was such an obvious thing to do.

Yet, in the media space, media products tend to see their competition in much narrower terms. So Autocar India sees only Overdrive, Top Gear and other titles of that ilk as competition; Man's World sees only GQ India as competition; the business titles only see other business titles as competition.

It's time to redefine the competition to something along the lines of ‘share of total audience'.

In today's context, those who are hungry for information, comment and analysis do not limit their searches to a single medium. A consumer seeking information on the Indian auto industry could choose from the print titles available, or the television shows that focus on cars, websites and blogs.

Similarly, a general entertainment channel competes with all the channels that could attract the consumer's attention at a particular time. Add to that other entertainment options such as entertainment-focused websites and portals, movies, eating out, and dining out and that is the competition.

While individual media products are defining their competition narrowly, the media houses themselves are not. Though the likes of Network18, Bennett Coleman & Company and Living Media have products designed to whittle away at other products in almost every segment that gains ‘share of total attention', their definition is limited to like-for-like. None has yet looked beyond the obvious competitors and targeted or protected themselves against such an eventuality.

That's dangerous, as has been proved by the success of the Indian Premier League (IPL). One product, which didn't even exist four years ago, is decimating television in India. It's three years since the IPL launched, and it has gained year-on-year, with all the other 300 odd channels in India losing. If they thought of the competition in the same way Coca-Cola did, the IPL wouldn't be half the monster it is.

This article was originally published in the 29 July 2010 issue of Media.

Source:
Campaign Asia

Related Articles

Just Published

1 day ago

Agency Report Cards 2024: We grade 25 APAC networks

The grades are in for Campaign Asia's 22nd annual evaluation of APAC agency networks. Subscribe to read our detailed analyses.

1 day ago

Publicis Groupe acquires influencer agency Captiv8

Captiv8 will join forces with the group's Influential and Epsilon.

1 day ago

Agency Report Card 2024: EssenceMediacom

In a difficult year underlined by restructuring and turmoil within parent company GroupM, the world’s largest media agency still holds many of the keys to mount a stronger rebound in 2025.

1 day ago

Disney sets sail: VP Sarah Fox on the brand’s ...

With localised strategy, strong fan engagement, and Disney’s knack for storytelling, Cruise Line will make its maiden voyage in December 2025. Campaign speaks exclusively with VP and regional GM Sarah Fox ahead of Campaign 360 next week.